Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the relationship between news article framing and the quality (health) of online reader comments. Using a dataset of 1M comments across 2.7K news articles, the study finds that article frames significantly predict comment health, even when controlling for topic. Furthermore, comments aligning with the article's frame exhibit higher health, and unhealthy top-level comments propagate further unhealthy responses, regardless of the frame.
The way a news article is framed doesn't just change *what* people say in the comments, it changes *how constructively* they say it.
Framing theory posits that how information is presented shapes audience responses, but computational work has largely ignored audience reactions. While recent work showed that article framing systematically shapes the content of reader responses, this paper asks: Does framing also affect response quality? Analyzing 1M comments across 2.7K news articles, we operationalize quality as comment health (constructive, good-faith contributions). We find that article frames significantly predict comment health while controlling for topic, and that comments that adopt the article frame are healthier than those that depart from it. Further, unhealthy top-level comments tend to generate more unhealthy responses, independent of the frame being used in the comment. Our results establish a link between framing theory and discourse quality, laying the groundwork for downstream applications. We illustrate this potential with a proactive frame-aware LLM- based system to mitigate unhealthy discourse
