Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the vulnerability of on-chain sanction enforcement for stablecoins like USDT and USDC on Ethereum, where sanctioned entities can exploit Miner Extractable Value (MEV) to evade freezes. By analyzing a comprehensive dataset of on-chain sanctions enforcement from 2017-2025, the authors quantify the extent of sanction evasion, finding that a significant percentage of sanctioned addresses were drained before enforcement. They further develop a game-theoretic model demonstrating the economic incentives for issuers to participate in the MEV market and potentially vertically integrate into block building.
Sanctioning crypto addresses is a cat-and-mouse game where economic incentives, not regulatory mandates, determine who wins, with nearly 20% of sanctioned USDC addresses drained before freezes took effect.
Centralized stablecoins such as USDT and USDC enforce financial sanctions through contract-layer blacklist functions, yet on public blockchains a freeze is merely an ordinary transaction that must compete for execution priority. We identify a fundamental gap between contract-layer authority and consensus-layer enforcement: when a sanctioned entity's transfer and the issuer's freeze race for inclusion in the same block, the outcome is determined not by regulatory mandate but by the economically motivated ordering decisions of block producers. We term the resulting value extraction Sanction-Evasion MEV (SE-MEV). To quantify this vulnerability, we construct the first comprehensive dataset of on-chain sanctions enforcement and evasion for Ethereum-based USDC and USDT (Nov 2017-Aug 2025), covering over $1.5 billion in frozen assets. We find that 7.3% of sanctioned USDT addresses and 18.7% of sanctioned USDC addresses were drained to zero balances before enforcement took effect, and document a clear escalation trajectory-from issuer-side out-of-gas failures, to public gas auctions, to private order flow, to direct proposer bribery. We further develop a game-theoretic model that yields three results: (i) compliant issuers cannot rationally stay outside the MEV market; (ii) fixed participation costs concentrate evasion among specialized, MEV-aware actors; and (iii) the implicit MEV tax extracted by block proposers grows without bound as regulatory penalties intensify, creating structural incentives for issuers to vertically integrate into block-building infrastructure. Our findings demonstrate that on any blockchain where ordering power is allocated by economic incentives, ordering power is sanctioning power-and contract-level authority alone cannot guarantee enforcement.
