Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper provides theoretical generalization bounds for physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) used to solve PDEs, connecting residual error control to solution-space error. The key result demonstrates that when neural network approximations reside within a compact subset of the solution space, minimizing the residual error ensures convergence to the true solution. The authors derive both deterministic and probabilistic convergence results, offering certified generalization bounds that translate residual, boundary, and initial errors into explicit solution error guarantees.
PINNs can now come with guarantees: vanishing residual error provably ensures convergence to the true PDE solution, bridging the gap between empirical performance and theoretical certainty.
Uncertainty quantification for partial differential equations is traditionally grounded in discretization theory, where solution error is controlled via mesh/grid refinement. Physics-informed neural networks fundamentally depart from this paradigm: they approximate solutions by minimizing residual losses at collocation points, introducing new sources of error arising from optimization, sampling, representation, and overfitting. As a result, the generalization error in the solution space remains an open problem. Our main theoretical contribution establishes generalization bounds that connect residual control to solution-space error. We prove that when neural approximations lie in a compact subset of the solution space, vanishing residual error guarantees convergence to the true solution. We derive deterministic and probabilistic convergence results and provide certified generalization bounds translating residual, boundary, and initial errors into explicit solution error guarantees.
