Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the impact of AI-mediated video communication (retouching, background replacement, avatars) on interpersonal trust and lie detection. Through two online experiments (N=2000), the study found that AI mediation reduces perceived trust and confidence in judgments, especially when avatars are used inconsistently. However, AI mediation did not affect participants' accuracy in detecting lies, challenging cue-based lie detection theories.
AI-mediated video calls erode trust and confidence, even though they don't actually make people worse at spotting lies.
AI-based tools that mediate, enhance or generate parts of video communication may interfere with how people evaluate trustworthiness and credibility. In two preregistered online experiments (N = 2,000), we examined whether AI-mediated video retouching, background replacement and avatars affect interpersonal trust, people's ability to detect lies and confidence in their judgments. Participants watched short videos of speakers making truthful or deceptive statements across three conditions with varying levels of AI mediation. We observed that perceived trust and confidence in judgments declined in AI-mediated videos, particularly in settings in which some participants used avatars while others did not. However, participants' actual judgment accuracy remained unchanged, and they were no more inclined to suspect those using AI tools of lying. Our findings provide evidence against concerns that AI mediation undermines people's ability to distinguish truth from lies, and against cue-based accounts of lie detection more generally. They highlight the importance of trustworthy AI mediation tools in contexts where not only truth, but also trust and confidence matter.
Stanford HAI