Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a mathematical framework to distinguish between cognitive amplification, where AI enhances human reasoning, and cognitive delegation, where reasoning is outsourced to AI. The framework uses metrics like the Cognitive Amplification Index (CAI*), Dependency Ratio (D), Human Reliance Index (HRI), and Human Cognitive Drift Rate (HCDR) to evaluate human-AI synergy. The analysis reveals a tension between maximizing short-term hybrid capability and preserving long-term human cognitive competence, advocating for a "cognitive sustainability constraint" in human-AI system design.
Blindly maximizing human-AI performance can degrade human expertise over time, revealing a critical trade-off that demands a new approach to system design.
Artificial intelligence is increasingly embedded in human decision-making, where it can either enhance human reasoning or induce excessive cognitive dependence. This paper introduces a conceptual and mathematical framework for distinguishing cognitive amplification, in which AI improves hybrid human-AI performance while preserving human expertise, from cognitive delegation, in which reasoning is progressively outsourced to AI systems. To characterize these regimes, we define a set of operational metrics: the Cognitive Amplification Index (CAI*), the Dependency Ratio (D), the Human Reliance Index (HRI), and the Human Cognitive Drift Rate (HCDR). Together, these quantities provide a low-dimensional metric space for evaluating not only whether human-AI systems achieve genuine synergistic performance, but also whether such performance is cognitively sustainable for the human component over time. The framework highlights a central design tension in human-AI systems: maximizing short-term hybrid capability does not necessarily preserve long-term human cognitive competence. We therefore argue that human-AI systems should be designed under a cognitive sustainability constraint, such that gains in hybrid performance do not come at the cost of degradation in human expertise.
