Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a training-free method for continuous image editing in text-conditioned generative models by steering the text embedding space. The method uses a large language model to automatically generate debiased contrastive prompt pairs, computes a steering vector, and applies an elastic range search to find an effective interval of steering magnitudes. The resulting approach achieves smooth and continuous edits comparable to training-based methods, as measured by a newly introduced metric for steering continuity.
Surprisingly, you can achieve smooth, controllable image editing in text-to-image models without any training, just by intelligently nudging the text embeddings.
We present a training-free framework for continuous and controllable image editing at test time for text-conditioned generative models. In contrast to prior approaches that rely on additional training or manual user intervention, we find that a simple steering in the text-embedding space is sufficient to produce smooth edit control. Given a target concept (e.g., enhancing photorealism or changing facial expression), we use a large language model to automatically construct a small set of debiased contrastive prompt pairs, from which we compute a steering vector in the generator's text-encoder space. We then add this vector directly to the input prompt representation to control generation along the desired semantic axis. To obtain a continuous control, we propose an elastic range search procedure that automatically identifies an effective interval of steering magnitudes, avoiding both under-steering (no-edit) and over-steering (changing other attributes). Adding the scaled versions of the same vector within this interval yields smooth and continuous edits. Since our method modifies only textual representations, it naturally generalizes across text-conditioned modalities, including image and video generation. To quantify the steering continuity, we introduce a new evaluation metric that measures the uniformity of semantic change across edit strengths. We compare the continuous editing behavior across methods and find that, despite its simplicity and lightweight design, our approach is comparable to training-based alternatives, outperforming other training-free methods.
