Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes the impact of Large Language Models (LLMs) on the theoretical underpinnings of Information Systems Engineering, specifically challenging established ontological, epistemological, and semiotic assumptions. It argues that LLMs necessitate a re-evaluation of the relationships between language, meaning, and system design, drawing on philosophical traditions to explore how generative models extend and destabilize classical notions. The paper concludes that LLMs should be viewed as epistemic agents that reshape the philosophical and semiotic foundations of information systems engineering, rather than mere automation tools.
LLMs aren't just better tools; they're forcing us to rethink the very nature of information, knowledge, and meaning in system design.
The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) represents a turning point in the theoretical foundations of Information Systems Engineering. Beyond their technical significance, LLMs challenge the ontological, epistemological, and semiotic assumptions that have long structured our understanding of in-formation, representation, and knowledge. This article proposes an integrative reflection on how LLMs reconfigure the relationships among language, meaning, and system design, suggesting that their emergence demands a re-examination of the conceptual foundations of contemporary information systems. Sketching on philosophical traditions from Peirce to Heidegger and Floridi, we investigate how the logic of generative models both extends and destabilises classical notions of ontology and signification. The discussion emphasises the necessity of grounding LLM-based systems in transparent, ethically coherent frameworks that respect the integrity of human-centred knowledge processes. Ultimately, the paper argues that LLMs should be understood not merely as tools for automation but as epistemic agents that reshape the philosophical and semiotic foundations of information systems engineering.
