Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Agentic Cognitive Profiling (ACP), a framework that uses LLM agents to decompose standardized cognitive assessments into atomic tasks and extract verifiable scoring primitives for Alzheimer's Disease (AD) detection. ACP decouples semantic understanding from measurement by using deterministic function calling to quantify agent outputs, mitigating hallucination and improving construct validity. Evaluated on a corpus of 402 participants across eight cognitive tasks, ACP achieves 90.5% score match rate and 85.3% AD prediction accuracy, outperforming baselines while providing interpretable cognitive profiles.
LLMs can achieve state-of-the-art Alzheimer's detection by mimicking clinical cognitive assessment protocols, not just learning statistical patterns.
Automated Alzheimer's Disease (AD) screening has predominantly followed the inductive paradigm of pattern recognition, which directly maps the input signal to the outcome label. This paradigm sacrifices construct validity of clinical protocol for statistical shortcuts. This paper proposes Agentic Cognitive Profiling (ACP), an agentic framework that realigns automated screening with clinical protocol logic across multiple cognitive domains. Rather than learning opaque mappings from transcripts to labels, the framework decomposes standardized assessments into atomic cognitive tasks and orchestrates specialized LLM agents to extract verifiable scoring primitives. Central to our design is decoupling semantic understanding from measurement by delegating all quantification to deterministic function calling, thereby mitigating hallucination and restoring construct validity. Unlike popular datasets that typically comprise around a hundred participants under a single task, we evaluate on a clinically-annotated corpus of 402 participants across eight structured cognitive tasks spanning multiple cognitive domains. The framework achieves 90.5% score match rate in task examination and 85.3% accuracy in AD prediction, surpassing popular baselines while generating interpretable cognitive profiles grounded in behavioral evidence. This work demonstrates that construct validity and predictive performance need not be traded off, charting a path toward AD screening systems that explain rather than merely predict.
