Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces PhonemeDF, a new dataset of phoneme-aligned real and synthetic speech derived from LibriSpeech and generated using multiple TTS and VC systems. The dataset aims to address the lack of resources for evaluating the naturalness of synthetic speech at the phoneme level and to improve audio deepfake detection. The authors use Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) to quantify the fidelity of synthetic phoneme distributions and demonstrate a correlation between KLD and the performance of deepfake classifiers, identifying discriminative phonemes for detection.
Forget training on entire utterances: PhonemeDF reveals that phoneme-level analysis and KLD can pinpoint the most vulnerable spots in synthetic speech, boosting deepfake detection.
The growing sophistication of speech generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI) has introduced new challenges in audio deepfake detection. Text-to-speech (TTS) and voice conversion (VC) technologies can create highly convincing synthetic speech with naturalness and intelligibility. This poses serious threats to voice biometric security and to systems designed to combat the spread of spoken misinformation, where synthetic voices may be used to disseminate false or malicious content. While interest in AI-generated speech has increased, resources for evaluating naturalness at the phoneme level remain limited. In this work, we address this gap by presenting the Phoneme-Level DeepFake dataset (PhonemeDF), comprising parallel real and synthetic speech segmented at the phoneme level. Real speech samples are derived from a subset of LibriSpeech, while synthetic samples are generated using four TTS and three VC systems. For each system, phoneme-aligned TextGrid files are obtained using the Montreal Forced Aligner (MFA). We compute the Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) between real and synthetic phoneme distributions to quantify fidelity and establish a ranking based on similarity to natural speech. Our findings show a clear correlation between the KLD of real and synthetic phoneme distributions and the performance of classifiers trained to distinguish them, suggesting that KLD can serve as an indicator of the most discriminative phonemes for deepfake detection.
