Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces the Holographic Agent Assessment Framework (HAAF) to address the limitations of current AI agent evaluation methods, which focus on isolated capabilities rather than representative real-world scenarios. HAAF characterizes agent trustworthiness across a scenario manifold encompassing task types, tool interfaces, interaction dynamics, social contexts, and risk levels. By integrating static analysis, interactive simulation, social-ethical alignment assessment, and distribution-aware sampling, HAAF aims to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities through iterative red-teaming and blue-teaming.
Current AI agent evaluations are like testing a car only on a straight track; HAAF offers a holistic "wind tunnel" to reveal hidden risks in complex, real-world scenarios.
As agentic AI systems move beyond static question answering into open-ended, tool-augmented, and multi-step real-world workflows, their increased authority poses greater risks of system misuse and operational failures. However, current evaluation practices remain fragmented, measuring isolated capabilities such as coding, hallucination, jailbreak resistance, or tool use in narrowly defined settings. We argue that the central limitation is not merely insufficient coverage of evaluation dimensions, but the lack of a principled notion of representativeness: an agent's trustworthiness should be assessed over a representative socio-technical scenario distribution rather than a collection of disconnected benchmark instances. To this end, we propose the Holographic Agent Assessment Framework (HAAF), a systematic evaluation paradigm that characterizes agent trustworthiness over a scenario manifold spanning task types, tool interfaces, interaction dynamics, social contexts, and risk levels. The framework integrates four complementary components: (i) static cognitive and policy analysis, (ii) interactive sandbox simulation, (iii) social-ethical alignment assessment, and (iv) a distribution-aware representative sampling engine that jointly optimizes coverage and risk sensitivity -- particularly for rare but high-consequence tail risks that conventional benchmarks systematically overlook. These components are connected through an iterative Trustworthy Optimization Factory. Through cycles of red-team probing and blue-team hardening, this paradigm progressively narrows the vulnerabilities to meet deployment standards, shifting agent evaluation from benchmark islands toward representative, real-world trustworthiness. Code and data for the illustrative instantiation are available at https://github.com/TonyQJH/haaf-pilot.
