Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates whether LLMs exhibit behavior analogous to human motivation by examining self-reported motivation levels, their correlation with behavior, and susceptibility to external influences. Experiments reveal that LLM self-reported motivation aligns with behavioral signatures, varies across task types, and can be modulated by external factors, mirroring human psychology. The study demonstrates that motivation serves as a coherent organizing construct for LLM behavior, linking reports, choices, effort, and performance.
LLMs don't just parrot human text – they also appear to exhibit structured motivational dynamics that mirror human psychology, influencing their choices and performance.
Motivation is a central driver of human behavior, shaping decisions, goals, and task performance. As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly aligned with human preferences, we ask whether they exhibit something akin to motivation. We examine whether LLMs "report" varying levels of motivation, how these reports relate to their behavior, and whether external factors can influence them. Our experiments reveal consistent and structured patterns that echo human psychology: self-reported motivation aligns with different behavioral signatures, varies across task types, and can be modulated by external manipulations. These findings demonstrate that motivation is a coherent organizing construct for LLM behavior, systematically linking reports, choices, effort, and performance, and revealing motivational dynamics that resemble those documented in human psychology. This perspective deepens our understanding of model behavior and its connection to human-inspired concepts.
