Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces Visual Equivalence Reward Model (Visual-ERM), a multimodal generative reward model that evaluates vision-to-code quality by assessing fine-grained visual discrepancies in the rendered visual space. Visual-ERM is integrated into reinforcement learning to improve the performance of Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct on chart-to-code, table parsing, and SVG parsing tasks. The proposed model outperforms Qwen3-VL-235B-Instruct on the new VisualCritic-RewardBench benchmark, demonstrating the efficacy of fine-grained visual reward supervision for vision-to-code RL.
Forget textual rules and coarse embeddings: fine-grained visual reward modeling is all you need to nail vision-to-code tasks, even surpassing models 30x larger.
Vision-to-code tasks require models to reconstruct structured visual inputs, such as charts, tables, and SVGs, into executable or structured representations with high visual fidelity. While recent Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) achieve strong results via supervised fine-tuning, reinforcement learning remains challenging due to misaligned reward signals. Existing rewards either rely on textual rules or coarse visual embedding similarity, both of which fail to capture fine-grained visual discrepancies and are vulnerable to reward hacking. We propose Visual Equivalence Reward Model (Visual-ERM), a multimodal generative reward model that provides fine-grained, interpretable, and task-agnostic feedback to evaluate vision-to-code quality directly in the rendered visual space. Integrated into RL, Visual-ERM improves Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct by +8.4 on chart-to-code and yields consistent gains on table and SVG parsing (+2.7, +4.1 on average), and further strengthens test-time scaling via reflection and revision. We also introduce VisualCritic-RewardBench (VC-RewardBench), a benchmark for judging fine-grained image-to-image discrepancies on structured visual data, where Visual-ERM at 8B decisively outperforms Qwen3-VL-235B-Instruct and approaches leading closed-source models. Our results suggest that fine-grained visual reward supervision is both necessary and sufficient for vision-to-code RL, regardless of task specificity.
