Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Whole Slide Difficulty (WSD), a measure of disagreement between expert and non-expert pathologists, to improve Gleason grading of prostate cancer slides using Multiple Instance Learning (MIL). They propose a multi-task approach and a weighted classification loss approach to incorporate WSD into the training process. Experiments demonstrate that integrating WSD consistently enhances classification performance, especially for higher Gleason grades, across various feature encoders and MIL methods.
Disagreement between pathologists, quantified as "Whole Slide Difficulty," can be leveraged to significantly boost the accuracy of AI Gleason grading, particularly for challenging cases.
Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) has been widely applied in histopathology to classify Whole Slide Images (WSIs) with slide-level diagnoses. While the ground truth is established by expert pathologists, the slides can be difficult to diagnose for non-experts and lead to disagreements between the annotators. In this paper, we introduce the notion of Whole Slide Difficulty (WSD), based on the disagreement between an expert and a non-expert pathologist. We propose two different methods to leverage WSD, a multi-task approach and a weighted classification loss approach, and we apply them to Gleason grading of prostate cancer slides. Results show that integrating WSD during training consistently improves the classification performance across different feature encoders and MIL methods, particularly for higher Gleason grades (i.e. worse diagnosis).
