Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the cost-benefit trade-offs of evolving task specialization in multi-robot systems performing a foraging task. They evolve both generalist controllers and task-specialist controllers (using artificial neural networks) under a limited optimization budget. The key finding is that, counterintuitively, generalist behaviors outperform task-specialist behaviors due to the specialists' failure to cooperate efficiently within the given budget.
Task specialization in robot swarms doesn't always improve efficiency, especially when you're on a tight optimization budget.
Task specialization can lead to simpler robot behaviors and higher efficiency in multi-robot systems. Previous works have shown the emergence of task specialization during evolutionary optimization, focusing on feasibility rather than costs. In this study, we take first steps toward a cost-benefit analysis of task specialization in robot swarms using a foraging scenario. We evolve artificial neural networks as generalist behaviors for the entire task and as task-specialist behaviors for subtasks within a limited evaluation budget. We show that generalist behaviors can be successfully optimized while the evolved task-specialist controllers fail to cooperate efficiently, resulting in worse performance than the generalists. Consequently, task specialization does not necessarily improve efficiency when optimization budget is limited.
