Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
StyleVLA, a physics-informed Vision Language Action (VLA) model, was developed to generate diverse and physically plausible driving behaviors in autonomous driving scenarios. The model incorporates a hybrid loss function combining kinematic consistency constraints with a continuous regression head to improve trajectory feasibility. Trained on a newly constructed large-scale dataset with diverse driving styles, StyleVLA outperforms proprietary models like Gemini-3-Pro and other state-of-the-art VLA models in a composite driving score measuring success rate, physical feasibility, and style adherence.
A 4B-parameter VLA model can beat Gemini-3-Pro in autonomous driving by incorporating physics-informed constraints and training on a specialized dataset of diverse driving styles.
Vision Language Models (VLMs) bridge visual perception and linguistic reasoning. In Autonomous Driving (AD), this synergy has enabled Vision Language Action (VLA) models, which translate high-level multimodal understanding into driving behaviors, typically represented as future trajectories. However, existing VLA models mainly generate generic collision-free trajectories. Beyond collision avoidance, adapting to diverse driving styles (e.g., sporty, comfortable) is essential for personalized driving. Moreover, many methods treat trajectory generation as naive token prediction, which can produce kinematically infeasible actions. To address these limitations, we present StyleVLA, a physics-informed VLA framework for generating diverse and physically plausible driving behaviors. We introduce a hybrid loss that combines a kinematic consistency constraint with a continuous regression head to improve trajectory feasibility. To train StyleVLA, built on Qwen3-VL-4B, we construct a large-scale instruction dataset with over 1.2k scenarios, 76k Bird's Eye View (BEV) samples, and 42k First Person View (FPV) samples, with ground-truth trajectories for five driving styles and natural-language instructions. Experiments show that our 4B-parameter StyleVLA significantly outperforms proprietary models (e.g., Gemini-3-Pro) and state-of-the-art VLA models. Using a composite driving score measuring success rate, physical feasibility, and style adherence, StyleVLA achieves 0.55 on BEV and 0.51 on FPV, versus 0.32 and 0.35 for Gemini-3-Pro. These results show that a specialized, physics-informed, lightweight model can surpass closed-source models on domain-specific tasks.
