Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes the emerging field of Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning (MMR), which tackles math problems using both text and visual inputs. It identifies key challenges in MMR models, including diagram misinterpretation, alignment failures, and inconsistent reasoning. The paper proposes a unified "Perception-Alignment-Reasoning" paradigm for understanding and comparing MMR approaches, focusing on extraction, representation/alignment, reasoning, and evaluation.
Current multimodal math models struggle with visual interpretation, symbol alignment, and consistent reasoning, highlighting the need for a unified "Perception-Alignment-Reasoning" framework.
Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning (MMR) has recently attracted increasing attention for its capability to solve mathematical problems that involve both textual and visual modalities. However, current models still face significant challenges in real-world visual math tasks. They often misinterpret diagrams, fail to align mathematical symbols with visual evidence, and produce inconsistent reasoning steps. Moreover, existing evaluations mainly focus on checking final answers rather than verifying the correctness or executability of each intermediate step. To address these limitations, a growing body of recent research addresses these issues by integrating structured perception, explicit alignment, and verifiable reasoning within unified frameworks. To establish a clear roadmap for understanding and comparing different MMR approaches, we systematically study them around four fundamental questions: (1) What to extract from multimodal inputs, (2) How to represent and align textual and visual information, (3) How to perform the reasoning, and (4) How to evaluate the correctness of the overall reasoning process. Finally, we discuss open challenges and offer perspectives on promising directions for future research.
AI2