Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the impact of social proof metrics (stars and downloads) on the adoption of open-source software. Through two field experiments on GitHub and Python package downloads, the authors manipulated star counts and download numbers for randomly selected repositories and packages. The key finding is that artificially inflated social proof metrics have no significant impact on subsequent downloads, forks, pull requests, issues, or other measures of developer engagement.
Turns out, buying stars and downloads for open-source software doesn't actually trick developers into using it.
Open-source software is widely used in commercial applications. Pair that with the fact that when choosing open-source software for a new problem, developers often use social proof as a cue. These two facts raise concerns that bad actors can game social proof metrics to induce the use of malign software. We study the question using two field experiments. On the largest developer platform, GitHub, we buy'stars'for a random set of GitHub repositories of new Python packages and estimate their impact on package downloads and broader repository activity. We find no discernible impact on downloads, nor on forks, pull requests, issues, or other measures of developer engagement. In another field experiment, we manipulate the number of human downloads for Python packages. Again, we find no detectable effect on subsequent downloads or on any measure of repository activity.
