Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a multi-agent informative path planning framework for off-world robotic exploration that uses Gaussian belief mapping to represent both scientific interest and environmental risk. The framework combines these beliefs with trajectory-intent representations to enable coordinated decision-making among multiple agents, balancing exploration within and outside predefined areas of interest (AOIs). Experiments in simulated lunar environments demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms sampling-based and greedy baselines, especially in risk-aware settings and under limited communication.
Forget predefined areas of interest: this multi-agent exploration framework uses Gaussian belief mapping to adaptively balance scientific discovery and safety in hazardous off-world environments.
Off-world multi-robot exploration is challenged by sparse targets, limited sensing, hazardous terrain, and restricted communication. Many scientifically valuable clues are visually ambiguous and often require close-range observations, making efficient and safe informative path planning essential. Existing methods often rely on predefined areas of interest (AOIs), which may be incomplete or biased, and typically handle terrain risk only through soft penalties, which are insufficient for avoiding non-recoverable regions. To address these issues, we propose a multi-agent informative path planning framework for sparse evidence discovery based on Gaussian belief mapping and dual-domain coverage. The method maintains Gaussian-process-based interest and risk beliefs and combines them with trajectory-intent representations to support coordinated sequential decision-making among multiple agents. It further prioritizes search inside the AOI while preserving limited exploration outside it, thereby improving robustness to AOI bias. In addition, the risk-aware design helps agents balance information gain and operational safety in hazardous environments. Experimental results in simulated lunar environments show that the proposed method consistently outperforms sampling-based and greedy baselines under different budgets and communication ranges. In particular, it achieves lower final uncertainty in risk-aware settings and remains robust under limited communication, demonstrating its effectiveness for cooperative off-world robotic exploration.
