Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper surveys the evolution of AI and Law research concerning legal interpretation, spanning expert systems, argumentation frameworks, and machine learning with LLMs. It highlights how expert systems aimed to encode human interpretations into knowledge bases, while argumentation research focused on modeling the structure and dialectical interactions of interpretive arguments. The survey concludes by examining the use of LLMs for automated generation of interpretive suggestions and arguments in legal practice.
AI's journey in legal interpretation has evolved from encoding expert knowledge to generating novel arguments with LLMs, raising questions about consistency, reasoning, and the future of legal practice.
AI and Law research has encountered legal interpretation in different ways, in the context of its evolving approaches and methodologies. Research on expert system has focused on legal knowledge engineering, with the goal of ensuring that human-generated interpretations can be precisely transferred into knowledge-bases, to be consistently applied. Research on argumentation has aimed at representing the structure of interpretive arguments, as well as their dialectical interactions, to assess of the acceptability of interpretive claims within argumentation frameworks. Research on machine learning has focused on the automated generation of interpretive suggestions and arguments, through general and specialised language models, now being increasingly deployed in legal practice.
