Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a benchmarking framework for datasets of software models used in model-driven engineering (MDE). The framework aims to address the current ad hoc creation and lack of quality guarantees in these datasets, which hinders comparability, reproducibility, and introduces bias. The proposed Benchmark Platform for MDE provides a unified infrastructure for assessing and comparing datasets based on defined criteria and metrics, ultimately improving the reliability and validity of MDE research.
Stop building software model datasets in the dark: a new benchmarking framework brings rigor and comparability to MDE dataset evaluation.
Empirical and LLM-based research in model-driven engineering increasingly relies on datasets of software models, for instance, to train or evaluate machine learning techniques for modeling support. These datasets have a significant impact on solution performance; hence, they should be treated and assessed as first-class artifacts. However, such datasets are typically collected or created ad hoc and without guarantees of their quality for the specific task for which they are used. This limits the comparability of results between studies, obscures dataset quality and representativeness, and leads to weak reproducibility and potential bias. In this work, we propose a benchmarking framework for model datasets (i.e., benchmarking the dataset itself). Benchmarking datasets involves systematically measuring their quality, representativeness, and suitability for specific tasks. To this end, we propose a Benchmark Platform for MDE that provides a unified infrastructure for systematically assessing and comparing datasets of software models across languages and formats, using defined criteria and metrics.
