Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a framework for learning individualized decision rules (IDRs) that incorporate demographic parity (DP) and conditional demographic parity (CDP) constraints to mitigate discriminatory effects arising from biased data. The approach derives optimal fair IDRs by applying perturbations to unconstrained optimal IDRs, leading to computational efficiency. Theoretical convergence rates are provided for both policy value and fairness constraint satisfaction, and empirical validation is performed using simulations and the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment.
Fairer individualized decision-making is now computationally tractable: optimal demographic parity constraints can be enforced by perturbing standard IDRs.
Individualized decision rules (IDRs) have become increasingly prevalent in societal applications such as personalized marketing, healthcare, and public policy design. However, a critical ethical concern arises from the potential discriminatory effects of IDRs trained on biased data. These algorithms may disproportionately harm individuals from minority subgroups defined by sensitive attributes like gender, race, or language. To address this issue, we propose a novel framework that incorporates demographic parity (DP) and conditional demographic parity (CDP) constraints into the estimation of optimal IDRs. We show that the theoretically optimal IDRs under DP and CDP constraints can be obtained by applying perturbations to the unconstrained optimal IDRs, enabling a computationally efficient solution. Theoretically, we derive convergence rates for both policy value and the fairness constraint term. The effectiveness of our methods is illustrated through comprehensive simulation studies and an empirical application to the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment.
