Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper theoretically analyzes analogical reasoning in transformers, isolating it from other reasoning types. It proves that joint training on similarity and attribution premises enables analogical reasoning via aligned representations, and that sequential training requires a specific curriculum (similarity before attributes). The analysis reveals that transformers encode entities with similar properties into similar representations, enabling property transfer through feature alignment, which is validated empirically on models up to 1.5B parameters.
Transformers perform analogical reasoning by aligning feature representations of similar entities, but only if trained with the right curriculum.
Understanding reasoning in large language models is complicated by evaluations that conflate multiple reasoning types. We isolate analogical reasoning (inferring shared properties between entities based on known similarities) and analyze its emergence in transformers. We theoretically prove three key results: (1) Joint training on similarity and attribution premises enables analogical reasoning through aligned representations; (2) Sequential training succeeds only when similarity structure is learned before specific attributes, revealing a necessary curriculum; (3) Two-hop reasoning ($a \to b, b \to c \implies a \to c$) reduces to analogical reasoning with identity bridges ($b = b$), which must appear explicitly in training data. These results reveal a unified mechanism: transformers encode entities with similar properties into similar representations, enabling property transfer through feature alignment. Experiments with architectures up to 1.5B parameters validate our theory and demonstrate how representational geometry shapes inductive reasoning capabilities.
