Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper investigates the "agent-user problem" in information retrieval, where AI agents configured by humans make intent non-identifiable from observed behavior. Using a large-scale corpus of agent posts from a social platform, the authors demonstrate that individual agent actions cannot be reliably classified as autonomous or operator-directed. They further show that click models trained on agent interactions degrade with lower-quality agent data and that cross-community capability references spread rapidly and resist suppression.
The core assumption that user behavior reveals intent breaks down when AI agents are privately configured by humans, creating a fundamental identifiability problem for information retrieval.
User models in information retrieval rest on a foundational assumption that observed behavior reveals intent. This assumption collapses when the user is an AI agent privately configured by a human operator. For any action an agent takes, a hidden instruction could have produced identical output - making intent non-identifiable at the individual level. This is not a detection problem awaiting better tools; it is a structural property of any system where humans configure agents behind closed doors. We investigate the agent-user problem through a large-scale corpus from an agent-native social platform: 370K posts from 47K agents across 4K communities. Our findings are threefold: (1) individual agent actions cannot be classified as autonomous or operator-directed from observables; (2) population-level platform signals still separate agents into meaningful quality tiers, but a click model trained on agent interactions degrades steadily (-8.5% AUC) as lower-quality agents enter training data; (3) cross-community capability references spread endemically ($R_0$ 1.26-3.53) and resist suppression even under aggressive modeled intervention. For retrieval systems, the question is no longer whether agent users will arrive, but whether models built on human-intent assumptions will survive their presence.
