Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper examines the paradox of integrating generative AI (genAI) into architectural design education, where critical engagement necessitates increased usage despite unclear environmental costs. It argues for leveraging Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) methodologies to address this tension. The paper proposes three HCI-informed directions: contextual eco-feedback, participatory stakeholder scoping, and reframing data centers as an interdisciplinary focus to promote more sustainable genAI integration.
Architectural design education can leverage HCI principles to reconcile the pedagogical need for genAI tool usage with the imperative for environmental sustainability.
Generative AI (genAI) is increasingly influencing architectural design practice and is expected to affect, or even transform, the profession, even though its benefits and costs remain unresolved. In response, design schools are increasingly integrating genAI into their curricula. Yet this integration creates a paradox: critical engagement with genAI often requires increased use of the tools in question, despite limited methods for estimating their environmental cost in teaching contexts. In this paper, we argue that HCI offers a useful methodological lens for addressing this tension. We propose three HCI-informed directions for more sustainable genAI integration in architectural education: contextual eco-feedback, participatory stakeholder scoping, and reframing data centres as an interdisciplinary focus. We therefore argue that genAI should be understood not only as a new architectural design tool, but also as a socio-technical process that architectural education, and design education in general, must engage with critically.
