Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper benchmarks the performance of MLLMs for business document information extraction, comparing MLLM-only pipelines against traditional OCR+MLLM approaches. They introduce an automated hierarchical error analysis framework using LLMs to diagnose error patterns. Results indicate that high-performing MLLMs can achieve comparable performance to OCR-enhanced methods, especially when combined with schema engineering, exemplars, and instructions.
Forget OCR? Powerful MLLMs can extract information from business documents just as well from images alone, challenging the necessity of traditional OCR pipelines.
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) enhance the potential of natural language processing. However, their actual impact on document information extraction remains unclear. In particular, it is unclear whether an MLLM-only pipeline--while simpler--can truly match the performance of traditional OCR+MLLM setups. In this paper, we conduct a large-scale benchmarking study that evaluates various out-of-the-box MLLMs on business-document information extraction. To examine and explore failure modes, we propose an automated hierarchical error analysis framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) to diagnose error patterns systematically. Our findings suggest that OCR may not be necessary for powerful MLLMs, as image-only input can achieve comparable performance to OCR-enhanced approaches. Moreover, we demonstrate that carefully designed schema, exemplars, and instructions can further enhance MLLMs performance. We hope this work can offer practical guidance and valuable insight for advancing document information extraction.
Stanford HAI