Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces recursive models as a solution to the limited context window challenge in long-horizon reasoning for language models, enabling them to overcome the inherent constraints of bounded context. They demonstrate theoretically that recursive decomposition allows solving problems with exponentially smaller active context compared to standard autoregressive models and prove optimality within a broader class of agentic systems. Empirically, a 3B model trained to reason recursively significantly outperforms state-of-the-art LLMs on Boolean satisfiability, a task requiring long-horizon combinatorial search.
Recursive models can exponentially shrink the context window needed for long-horizon reasoning, blowing past the limitations of even the biggest LLMs.
Modern language models reason within bounded context, an inherent constraint that poses a fundamental barrier to long-horizon reasoning. We identify recursion as a core principle for overcoming this barrier, and propose recursive models as a minimal realization, where the model can recursively invoke itself to solve subtasks in isolated contexts. We prove that any computable problem admits a recursive decomposition in which each subtask requires only exponentially smaller active context than standard autoregressive models; this strictly surpasses any context management approach confined to a single sequence, such as summarization. We further generalize our framework to modern agentic systems with arbitrary context processing and control flows, and prove that recursive models can achieve optimal power within this broader class. Experimentally, we train a 3B model to reason recursively and evaluate on Boolean satisfiability, a task requiring long-horizon combinatorial search, where it significantly outperforms frontier LLMs.
