Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a system for automatically identifying and classifying filler-gap dependencies (matrix wh-questions, embedded wh-questions, and relative clauses) and their extraction sites (subject, object, adjunct) in child-directed speech. The system combines constituency and dependency parsing to achieve high accuracy on human-annotated data. Applying this system to 57 English CHILDES corpora, the authors characterize children's input and production of filler-gap dependencies, revealing construction-specific frequencies and extraction-site asymmetries.
Automating the detection of subtle grammatical structures in child-directed speech finally lets us quantify the precise linguistic input children receive, potentially settling long-standing debates about innate knowledge vs. distributional learning.
Children's acquisition of filler-gap dependencies has been argued by some to depend on innate grammatical knowledge, while others suggest that the distributional evidence available in child-directed speech suffices. Unfortunately, the relevant input is difficult to quantify at scale with fine granularity, making this question difficult to resolve. We present a system that identifies three core filler-gap constructions in spoken English corpora -- matrix wh-questions, embedded wh-questions, and relative clauses -- and further identifies the extraction site (i.e., subject vs. object vs. adjunct). Our approach combines constituency and dependency parsing, leveraging their complementary strengths for construction classification and extraction site identification. We validate the system on human-annotated data and find that it scores well across most categories. Applying the system to 57 English CHILDES corpora, we are able to characterize children's filler-gap input and their filler-gap production trajectories over the course of development, including construction-specific frequencies and extraction-site asymmetries. The resulting fine-grained labels enable future work in both acquisition and computational studies, which we demonstrate with a case study using filtered corpus training with language models.
