Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates how AI agents can achieve collaborative context awareness by interpreting concurrent user actions on shared artifacts and adapting in real-time within a co-creative design setting. They found that process visibility alone can expose conflicts, and developed CLEO, an agent that interprets collaborative intent. Through a two-day study with designers, they identified interaction patterns, triggers, and enabling factors influencing delegation, direction, and concurrent work, leading to a decision model for human-agent collaboration.
Designers prefer delegating 70% of the time to co-creative AI agents, but only if the agent can interpret collaborative intent and adapt in real-time to concurrent user actions.
Human collaborators coordinate dynamically through process visibility and workspace awareness, yet AI agents typically either provide only final outputs or expose read-only execution processes (e.g., planning, reasoning) without interpreting concurrent user actions on shared artifacts. Building on mixed-initiative interaction principles, we explore whether agents can achieve collaborative context awareness -- interpreting concurrent user actions on shared artifacts and adapting in real-time. Study 1 (N=10 professional designers) revealed that process visibility enabled reasoning about agent actions but exposed conflicts when agents could not distinguish feedback from independent work. We developed CLEO, which interprets collaborative intent and adapts in real-time. Study 2 (N=10, two-day with stimulated recall interviews) analyzed 214 turns, identifying five action patterns, six triggers, and four enabling factors explaining when designers choose delegation (70.1%), direction (28.5%), or concurrent work (31.8%). We present a decision model with six interaction loops, design implications, and an annotated dataset.
