Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper addresses the limitations of existing logic-based explanation methods for ML classifiers, which often provide overly constrained explanations with limited coverage. They propose two novel methods, Onestep and Twostep, to generate more general logic-based explanations while maintaining correctness. Twostep significantly improves explanation coverage compared to Onestep and prior iterative approaches by adjusting feature bounds in a gradual, two-step process.
Logic-based explanations for ML classifiers get a coverage boost of up to 72% with a new two-step optimization method.
Machine learning models support decision-making, yet the reasons behind their predictions are opaque. Clear and reliable explanations help users make informed decisions and avoid blindly trusting model outputs. However, many existing explanation methods fail to guarantee correctness. Logic-based approaches ensure correctness but often offer overly constrained explanations, limiting coverage. Recent work addresses this by incrementally expanding explanations while maintaining correctness. This process is performed separately for each feature, adjusting both its upper and lower bounds. However, this approach faces a trade-off: smaller increments incur high computational costs, whereas larger ones may lead to explanations covering fewer instances. To overcome this, we propose two novel methods. Onestep builds upon this prior work, generating explanations in a single step for each feature and each bound, eliminating the overhead of an iterative process. \textit{Twostep} takes a gradual approach, improving coverage. Experimental results show that Twostep significantly increases explanation coverage (by up to 72.60\% on average across datasets) compared to Onestep and, consequently, to prior work.
