Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the Sentience Readiness Index (SRI), a composite index measuring national preparedness for the possibility of artificial sentience across six weighted categories for 31 jurisdictions, addressing a gap in existing AI readiness indices. The SRI employs LLM-assisted expert scoring with iterative expert review, following the OECD/JRC framework for composite indicators. Results indicate that no jurisdiction is adequately prepared, with the UK leading at 49/100, highlighting a need for improved institutional, professional, and cultural infrastructure.
No country is ready for sentient AI, according to a new index measuring preparedness across research, ethics, and policy.
The scientific study of consciousness has begun to generate testable predictions about artificial systems. A landmark collaborative assessment evaluated current AI architectures against six leading theories of consciousness and found that none currently qualifies as a strong candidate, but that future systems might. A precautionary approach to AI sentience, which holds that credible possibility of sentience warrants governance action even without proof, has gained philosophical and institutional traction. Yet existing AI readiness indices, including the Oxford Insights Government AI Readiness Index, the IMF AI Preparedness Index, and the Stanford AI Index, measure economic, technological, and governance preparedness without assessing whether societies are prepared for the possibility that AI systems might warrant moral consideration. This paper introduces the Sentience Readiness Index (SRI), a composite index measuring national-level preparedness across six weighted categories for 31 jurisdictions. The SRI was constructed following the OECD/JRC framework for composite indicators and employs LLM-assisted expert scoring with iterative expert review. No jurisdiction exceeds"Partially Prepared"(the United Kingdom leads at 49/100). Research Environment scores are universally the strongest category; Professional Readiness is universally the weakest. These findings suggest that if AI sentience becomes scientifically plausible, no society currently possesses adequate institutional, professional, or cultural infrastructure to respond. The SRI provides a diagnostic baseline and identifies specific capacity deficits that policy can address.
