Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes artistic approaches to narrativity that diverge from the anthropomorphic model of generative AI, which focuses on mimicking human narrative construction. It argues that artists often prioritize ideational exploration over plausibility, leading to generative experiments with non-verbal forms and events. By examining several artistic exemplars, the paper highlights their expressive features and their value in critically assessing the cultural influence and limitations of generative AI.
Artistic explorations of narrativity reveal the limitations of generative AI's anthropomorphic approach, suggesting alternative pathways for creative expression beyond mere human mimicry.
Recent advancements in generative artificial intelligence (generative AI) technologies have transformed the computer science discipline of natural language processing. However, generative AI retains the anthropomorphic model of simulating human narrative construction and verbal communication whereas, for artists, the ideational exploration is often more important than human mimicry or even plausibility in storytelling. It sometimes leads to generative experiments with non-verbal forms or events that have the potential to incite narratives through the audience's experience of the works' functionalities, backgrounds, and contexts. In this paper, we focus on such artistic approaches to narrativity. In five central sections, we discuss interrelated exemplars whose conceptual frameworks, methodologies, and other attributes anticipate or underscore the issues of contemporary linguistic automation based on massive datafication and statistical retrospection. In closing sections, we summarize the expressive features of these exemplars and underline their value for critically assessing generative AI's cultural influence and fallouts.
