Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces CiteAudit, a benchmark and framework for detecting hallucinated citations in scientific writing, addressing the increasing risk of fabricated references generated by LLMs. They construct a large-scale, human-validated dataset and a multi-agent verification pipeline that decomposes citation checking into claim extraction, evidence retrieval, passage matching, reasoning, and calibrated judgment. Experiments demonstrate that CiteAudit significantly outperforms existing methods in identifying citation errors and improving the trustworthiness of scientific references.
LLMs are introducing a citation crisis in scientific literature, and CiteAudit offers a scalable solution to detect fabricated references with significantly improved accuracy and interpretability.
Scientific research relies on accurate citation for attribution and integrity, yet large language models (LLMs) introduce a new risk: fabricated references that appear plausible but correspond to no real publications. Such hallucinated citations have already been observed in submissions and accepted papers at major machine learning venues, exposing vulnerabilities in peer review. Meanwhile, rapidly growing reference lists make manual verification impractical, and existing automated tools remain fragile to noisy and heterogeneous citation formats and lack standardized evaluation. We present the first comprehensive benchmark and detection framework for hallucinated citations in scientific writing. Our multi-agent verification pipeline decomposes citation checking into claim extraction, evidence retrieval, passage matching, reasoning, and calibrated judgment to assess whether a cited source truly supports its claim. We construct a large-scale human-validated dataset across domains and define unified metrics for citation faithfulness and evidence alignment. Experiments with state-of-the-art LLMs reveal substantial citation errors and show that our framework significantly outperforms prior methods in both accuracy and interpretability. This work provides the first scalable infrastructure for auditing citations in the LLM era and practical tools to improve the trustworthiness of scientific references.
