Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a multi-agent LLM framework for financial trading that decomposes investment analysis into fine-grained tasks, addressing limitations of coarse-grained instruction approaches. The framework is evaluated on Japanese stock data using a leakage-controlled backtesting environment, demonstrating improved risk-adjusted returns compared to conventional methods. The study highlights the importance of aligning analytical outputs with downstream decision preferences and leverages portfolio optimization to achieve superior performance.
Fine-grained task decomposition in LLM-powered trading agents unlocks significantly better risk-adjusted returns, outperforming traditional coarse-grained approaches.
The advancement of large language models (LLMs) has accelerated the development of autonomous financial trading systems. While mainstream approaches deploy multi-agent systems mimicking analyst and manager roles, they often rely on abstract instructions that overlook the intricacies of real-world workflows, which can lead to degraded inference performance and less transparent decision-making. Therefore, we propose a multi-agent LLM trading framework that explicitly decomposes investment analysis into fine-grained tasks, rather than providing coarse-grained instructions. We evaluate the proposed framework using Japanese stock data, including prices, financial statements, news, and macro information, under a leakage-controlled backtesting setting. Experimental results show that fine-grained task decomposition significantly improves risk-adjusted returns compared to conventional coarse-grained designs. Crucially, further analysis of intermediate agent outputs suggests that alignment between analytical outputs and downstream decision preferences is a critical driver of system performance. Moreover, we conduct standard portfolio optimization, exploiting low correlation with the stock index and the variance of each system's output. This approach achieves superior performance. These findings contribute to the design of agent structure and task configuration when applying LLM agents to trading systems in practical settings.
