Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a conceptual model for agentic AI design that integrates Scene (observable situation), Context (user-constructed meaning), and Human Behavior Factors to improve AI's judgment about when to act. The model addresses the problem of inappropriate AI interventions by distinguishing between observable situations and user-interpreted meanings, accounting for variations in behavioral outcomes. The authors derive five agent design principles—behavioral alignment, contextual sensitivity, temporal appropriateness, motivational calibration, and agency preservation—to guide the design of contextually sensitive and judicious agentic AI systems.
Agentic AI often blunders because it mistakes observable situations for actual user needs – this model offers a way to bridge that gap.
Agentic AI increasingly intervenes proactively by inferring users'situations from contextual data yet often fails for lack of principled judgment about when, why, and whether to act. We address this gap by proposing a conceptual model that reframes behavior as an interpretive outcome integrating Scene (observable situation), Context (user-constructed meaning), and Human Behavior Factors (determinants shaping behavioral likelihood). Grounded in multidisciplinary perspectives across the humanities, social sciences, HCI, and engineering, the model separates what is observable from what is meaningful to the user and explains how the same scene can yield different behavioral meanings and outcomes. To translate this lens into design action, we derive five agent design principles (behavioral alignment, contextual sensitivity, temporal appropriateness, motivational calibration, and agency preservation) that guide intervention depth, timing, intensity, and restraint. Together, the model and principles provide a foundation for designing agentic AI systems that act with contextual sensitivity and judgment in interactions.
