Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper addresses the problem of inefficient reasoning in LLMs using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, where verbose reasoning steps lead to high inference latency. They identify that existing compression methods cause entropy collapse, hindering the discovery of valid reasoning paths for difficult questions. To mitigate this, they propose a difficulty-aware RL-based approach, CEEH, which selectively applies entropy regularization based on instance difficulty, preserving exploration for hard questions while compressing easy ones, and uses a dynamic optimal-length penalty.
LLM reasoning can be compressed without sacrificing accuracy by selectively encouraging exploration only on difficult questions, preventing premature entropy collapse.
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has substantially empowered Large Language Models (LLMs) to tackle complex reasoning tasks, yet the verbose nature of explicit reasoning steps incurs prohibitive inference latency and computational costs, limiting real-world deployment. While existing compression methods - ranging from self-training to Reinforcement Learning (RL) with length constraints - attempt to mitigate this, they often sacrifice reasoning capability for brevity. We identify a critical failure mode in these approaches: explicitly optimizing for shorter trajectories triggers rapid entropy collapse, which prematurely shrinks the exploration space and stifles the discovery of valid reasoning paths, particularly for challenging questions requiring extensive deduction. To address this issue, we propose Compress responses for Easy questions and Explore Hard ones (CEEH), a difficulty-aware approach to RL-based efficient reasoning. CEEH dynamically assesses instance difficulty to apply selective entropy regularization: it preserves a diverse search space for currently hard questions to ensure robustness, while permitting aggressive compression on easier instances where the reasoning path is well-established. In addition, we introduce a dynamic optimal-length penalty anchored to the historically shortest correct response, which effectively counteracts entropy-induced length inflation and stabilizes the reward signal. Across six reasoning benchmarks, CEEH consistently reduces response length while maintaining accuracy comparable to the base model, and improves Pass@k relative to length-only optimization.
