Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces and compares eight surrogate models for predicting fluid flow in porous media, focusing on rock-fluid interaction, to address the computational expense of high-fidelity numerical models. Four models are reduced-order models (ROMs) using neural networks for compression and prediction, while the other four are single neural networks designed for grid-size invariance, enabling inference on larger computational domains than used during training. The study demonstrates that a grid-size-invariant approach using a UNet++ architecture outperforms both UNet and ROMs, offering a reliable method to reduce memory consumption during training while maintaining good prediction accuracy in the context of fluid-induced rock dissolution.
Unlock faster rock-fluid interaction simulations: a new grid-size-invariant surrogate model slashes computational costs and outperforms traditional reduced-order models.
Modelling rock-fluid interaction requires solving a set of partial differential equations (PDEs) to predict the flow behaviour and the reactions of the fluid with the rock on the interfaces. Conventional high-fidelity numerical models require a high resolution to obtain reliable results, resulting in huge computational expense. This restricts the applicability of these models for multi-query problems, such as uncertainty quantification and optimisation, which require running numerous scenarios. As a cheaper alternative to high-fidelity models, this work develops eight surrogate models for predicting the fluid flow in porous media. Four of these are reduced-order models (ROM) based on one neural network for compression and another for prediction. The other four are single neural networks with the property of grid-size invariance; a term which we use to refer to image-to-image models that are capable of inferring on computational domains that are larger than those used during training. In addition to the novel grid-size-invariant framework for surrogate models, we compare the predictive performance of UNet and UNet++ architectures, and demonstrate that UNet++ outperforms UNet for surrogate models. Furthermore, we show that the grid-size-invariant approach is a reliable way to reduce memory consumption during training, resulting in good correlation between predicted and ground-truth values and outperforming the ROMs analysed. The application analysed is particularly challenging because fluid-induced rock dissolution results in a non-static solid field and, consequently, it cannot be used to help in adjustments of the future prediction.
