Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses the limitations of individual-focused causal responsibility metrics in spatial interactions, particularly in scenarios with causal overdetermination. The authors introduce a novel metric for quantifying the causal responsibility of groups of agents, addressing the gaps left by individual-centric approaches. They also formalize assertive influences and propose a tiering algorithm to identify assertive agents within groups, demonstrating the utility of their approach through scenario-based simulations.
Current responsibility metrics fail when multiple agents cause the same outcome, but this new group-level metric can fill those gaps.
Heralding the advent of autonomous vehicles and mobile robots that interact with humans, responsibility in spatial interaction is burgeoning as a research topic. Even though metrics of responsibility tailored to spatial interactions have been proposed, they are mostly focused on the responsibility of individual agents. Metrics of causal responsibility focusing on individuals fail in cases of causal overdeterminism -- when many actors simultaneously cause an outcome. To fill the gaps in causal responsibility left by individual-focused metrics, we formulate a metric for the causal responsibility of groups. To identify assertive agents that are causally responsible for the trajectory of an affected agent, we further formalise the types of assertive influences and propose a tiering algorithm for systematically identifying assertive agents. Finally, we use scenario-based simulations to illustrate the benefits of considering groups and how the emergence of group effects vary with interaction dynamics and the proximity of agents.
