Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes the privacy policies and terms of service of six Western and Chinese romantic AI platforms to understand their data governance practices regarding intimate user disclosures. It reveals that user's intimate disclosures are treated as reusable data assets, granting platforms broad permissions for data storage, analysis, and model training. The study identifies default training appropriation, ownership reconstruction, and intimate history assetization as key mechanisms that expand platform rights while shifting risks to users.
Romantic AI platforms treat your deepest secrets as reusable training data, granting themselves broad rights while leaving you holding the bag.
Romantic AI platforms invite intimate emotional disclosure, yet their data governance practices remain underexamined. This preliminary study analyses the Privacy Policies and Terms of Service of six Western and Chinese romantic AI platforms. We find that intimate disclosures are often positioned as reusable data assets, with broad permissions for storage, analysis, and model training. We identify default training appropriation, ownership reconstruction, and intimate history assetization as key mechanisms structuring these practices, expanding platforms'rights while shifting risk onto users. Our findings surface key governance challenges in romantic AI and are intended to provoke discussion and inform future empirical and design research on human AI intimacy and its governance.
