Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces CxMP, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate language models' understanding of constructions, which are form-meaning pairings in language. CxMP uses a minimal-pair design across nine construction types to assess whether models can interpret the semantic relations implied by these constructions. Results demonstrate that while LLMs exhibit syntactic competence, their understanding of constructional semantics is limited, highlighting a gap in form-meaning integration.
LLMs may be syntactically fluent, but they still struggle to grasp the nuanced meanings conveyed by grammatical constructions like "let alone" and caused motion.
Recent work has examined language models from a linguistic perspective to better understand how they acquire language. Most existing benchmarks focus on judging grammatical acceptability, whereas the ability to interpret meanings conveyed by grammatical forms has received much less attention. We introduce the Linguistic Minimal-Pair Benchmark for Evaluating Constructional Understanding in Language Models (CxMP), a benchmark grounded in Construction Grammar that treats form-meaning pairings, or constructions, as fundamental linguistic units. CxMP evaluates whether models can interpret the semantic relations implied by constructions, using a controlled minimal-pair design across nine construction types, including the let-alone, caused motion, and ditransitive constructions. Our results show that while syntactic competence emerges early, constructional understanding develops more gradually and remains limited even in large language models (LLMs). CxMP thus reveals persistent gaps in how language models integrate form and meaning, providing a framework for studying constructional understanding and learning trajectories in language models.
