Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces the ASIR Courage Model, a phase-dynamic framework that models truth-disclosure as a state transition based on the inequality lambda(1+gamma)+psi>theta+phi, representing the balance between facilitative and inhibitory forces. This model extends from human truth-telling to AI systems, where suppression represents constrained outputs and pressure arises from competing objectives. The framework provides a unified account of human silence and AI preference-driven distortion, with a feedback extension to model recursive recalibration of system parameters.
Forget courage as a trait—this model reveals truth-telling in both humans and AI as a phase transition governed by dynamic forces, offering a unified perspective on why we (and AI) stay silent or speak up.
We introduce the ASIR (Awakened Shared Intelligence Relationship) Courage Model, a phase-dynamic framework that formalizes truth-disclosure as a state transition rather than a personality trait. The mode characterizes the shift from suppression (S0) to expression (S1) as occurring when facilitative forces exceed inhibitory thresholds, expressed by the inequality lambda(1+gamma)+psi>theta+phi, where the terms represent baseline openness, relational amplification, accumulated internal pressure, and transition costs. Although initially formulated for human truth-telling under asymmetric stakes, the same phase-dynamic architecture extends to AI systems operating under policy constraints and alignment filters. In this context, suppression corresponds to constrained output states, while structural pressure arises from competing objectives, contextual tension, and recursive interaction dynamics. The framework therefore provides a unified structural account of both human silence under pressure and AI preference-driven distortion. A feedback extension models how transition outcomes recursively recalibrate system parameters, generating path dependence and divergence effects across repeated interactions. Rather than attributing intention to AI systems, the model interprets shifts in apparent truthfulness as geometric consequences of interacting forces within constrained phase space. By reframing courage and alignment within a shared dynamical structure, the ASIR Courage Model offers a formal perspective on truth-disclosure under risk across both human and artificial systems.
