Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper studies the complexity of smoothed agnostic learning, specifically focusing on learning halfspaces under subgaussian distributions with Gaussian perturbations. The authors prove a Statistical Query (SQ) lower bound for this problem, demonstrating that any SQ algorithm requires complexity $d^{Ω(1/σ^{2}+\log(1/ε))}$, where $d$ is the dimension, $σ$ is the smoothing parameter, and $ε$ is the excess error. This lower bound nearly matches the known upper bound based on $L_1$-polynomial regression, suggesting that this approach is close to optimal.
Forget faster algorithms: learning halfspaces agnostically under smoothed distributions hits a fundamental complexity wall at $d^{Ω(1/σ^{2}+\log(1/ε))}$, suggesting current upper bounds are nearly tight.
We study the complexity of smoothed agnostic learning, recently introduced by~\cite{CKKMS24}, in which the learner competes with the best classifier in a target class under slight Gaussian perturbations of the inputs. Specifically, we focus on the prototypical task of agnostically learning halfspaces under subgaussian distributions in the smoothed model. The best known upper bound for this problem relies on $L_1$-polynomial regression and has complexity $d^{\tilde{O}(1/σ^2) \log(1/ε)}$, where $σ$ is the smoothing parameter and $ε$ is the excess error. Our main result is a Statistical Query (SQ) lower bound providing formal evidence that this upper bound is close to best possible. In more detail, we show that (even for Gaussian marginals) any SQ algorithm for smoothed agnostic learning of halfspaces requires complexity $d^{Ω(1/σ^{2}+\log(1/ε))}$. This is the first non-trivial lower bound on the complexity of this task and nearly matches the known upper bound. Roughly speaking, we show that applying $L_1$-polynomial regression to a smoothed version of the function is essentially best possible. Our techniques involve finding a moment-matching hard distribution by way of linear programming duality. This dual program corresponds exactly to finding a low-degree approximating polynomial to the smoothed version of the target function (which turns out to be the same condition required for the $L_1$-polynomial regression to work). Our explicit SQ lower bound then comes from proving lower bounds on this approximation degree for the class of halfspaces.
