Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper benchmarks CNNs, LSTMs, BERT, and hybrid models for hate speech detection on social media, finding that while BERT achieves high accuracy, hybrid models can offer improvements in specific cases. The study also introduces and evaluates novel text transformation techniques designed to neutralize hate speech. The results highlight the trade-offs between model complexity and performance, and suggest avenues for future research in building more effective hate speech detection systems.
Hybrid models can sometimes beat BERT at hate speech detection, and neutralizing text transformations offer a new mitigation path.
The proliferation of hate speech on social media platforms has necessitated the development of effective detection and moderation tools. This study evaluates the efficacy of various machine learning models in identifying hate speech and offensive language and investigates the potential of text transformation techniques to neutralize such content. We compare traditional models like CNNs and LSTMs with advanced neural network models such as BERT and its derivatives, alongside exploring hybrid models that combine different architectural features. Our results indicate that while advanced models like BERT show superior accuracy due to their deep contextual understanding, hybrid models exhibit improved capabilities in certain scenarios. Furthermore, we introduce innovative text transformation approaches that convert negative expressions into neutral ones, thereby potentially mitigating the impact of harmful content. The implications of these findings are discussed, highlighting the strengths and limitations of current technologies and proposing future directions for more robust hate speech detection systems.
