Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the communicative efficiency of exact recursive numeral systems across 52 genetically diverse languages, challenging the claim that languages optimally balance lexicon size and morphosyntactic complexity. By introducing an annotation scheme that distinguishes between predictable and unpredictable allomorphy, the authors demonstrate that many languages exhibit lower communicative efficiency than predicted by optimality models. This finding suggests that factors beyond communicative efficiency, such as historical contingency or cognitive biases, play a significant role in shaping numeral systems.
Many of the world's languages are surprisingly inefficient in their numeral systems, challenging the prevailing view that communicative efficiency is the primary driver of their evolution.
Recent research argues that exact recursive numeral systems optimize communicative efficiency by balancing a tradeoff between the size of the numeral lexicon and the average morphosyntactic complexity (roughly length in morphemes) of numeral terms. We argue that previous studies have not characterized the data in a fashion that accounts for the degree of complexity languages display. Using data from 52 genetically diverse languages and an annotation scheme distinguishing between predictable and unpredictable allomorphy (formal variation), we show that many of the world's languages are decisively less efficient than one would expect. We discuss the implications of our findings for the study of numeral systems and linguistic evolution more generally.
