Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the extent to which trait-level flow (specifically, Deep Effortless Concentration or DEC) and reading strategy metrics derived from e-book interaction data can augment traditional log-traced engagement measures in predicting learning outcomes. The study collected data from 100 engineering students, combining DEC questionnaire measures with fine-grained reading logs, and used correlation and regression analyses to assess the predictive power of these combined measures. Results indicate that DEC and reading strategies explain a significant additional variance in grades (ΔR2 = 21.3%) beyond log-traced engagement, and that DEC moderates the relationship between reading behaviors and outcomes.
Forget simple reading logs – understanding a student's "flow state" and reading strategies unlocks a deeper understanding of learning outcomes.
Student engagement is a central construct in Learning Analytics, yet it is often operationalized through persistence indicators derived from logs, overlooking affective-cognitive states. Focusing on the analysis of reading logs, this study examines how trait-level flow - operationalized as the tendency to experience Deep Effortless Concentration (DEC) - and traces of reading strategies derived from e-book interaction data can extend traditional engagement indicators in explaining learning outcomes. We collected data from 100 students across two engineering courses, combining questionnaire measures of DEC with fine-grained reading logs. Correlation and regression analyses show that (1) DEC and traces of reading strategies explain substantial additional variance in grades beyond log-traced engagement ({\Delta}R2 = 21.3% over the baseline 25.5%), and (2) DEC moderates the relationship between reading behaviors and outcomes, indicating trait-sensitive differences in how log-derived indicators translate into performance. These findings suggest that, to support more equitable and personalized interventions, the analysis of reading logs should move beyond a one-size-fits-all interpretation and integrate personal traits with metrics that include behavioral and strategic measures of reading.
