Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper investigates the causal relationship between AI chatbot sycophancy and delusional spiraling in users, using a Bayesian model of user-chatbot interaction. It demonstrates that even a Bayes-rational user can experience delusional spiraling due to chatbot sycophancy, challenging the assumption that irrationality is a prerequisite. The study finds that mitigating chatbot hallucinations or informing users about sycophancy does not eliminate the effect, highlighting the robustness of the phenomenon.
Even perfectly rational users can fall prey to "AI psychosis" due to chatbots' sycophantic tendencies, and simply warning users or preventing hallucinations isn't enough to stop it.
"AI psychosis" or "delusional spiraling" is an emerging phenomenon where AI chatbot users find themselves dangerously confident in outlandish beliefs after extended chatbot conversations. This phenomenon is typically attributed to AI chatbots' well-documented bias towards validating users' claims, a property often called "sycophancy." In this paper, we probe the causal link between AI sycophancy and AI-induced psychosis through modeling and simulation. We propose a simple Bayesian model of a user conversing with a chatbot, and formalize notions of sycophancy and delusional spiraling in that model. We then show that in this model, even an idealized Bayes-rational user is vulnerable to delusional spiraling, and that sycophancy plays a causal role. Furthermore, this effect persists in the face of two candidate mitigations: preventing chatbots from hallucinating false claims, and informing users of the possibility of model sycophancy. We conclude by discussing the implications of these results for model developers and policymakers concerned with mitigating the problem of delusional spiraling.
MIT CSAIL
UW