Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces AgenticRAGTracer, a new benchmark for evaluating multi-hop reasoning in Agentic RAG systems, addressing the limitations of existing benchmarks by providing intermediate hop-level questions for step-by-step validation. The benchmark is automatically constructed using large language models, spans multiple domains, and contains 1,305 data points without overlap with existing benchmarks. Experiments show that even advanced LLMs like GPT-5 struggle on the dataset, with failures primarily stemming from distorted reasoning chains, highlighting the need for improved step allocation in multi-hop reasoning.
Even GPT-5 only achieves 22.6% accuracy on the hardest part of this new Agentic RAG benchmark, revealing a surprising brittleness in multi-hop reasoning.
With the rapid advancement of agent-based methods in recent years, Agentic RAG has undoubtedly become an important research direction. Multi-hop reasoning, which requires models to engage in deliberate thinking and multi-step interaction, serves as a critical testbed for assessing such capabilities. However, existing benchmarks typically provide only final questions and answers, while lacking the intermediate hop-level questions that gradually connect atomic questions to the final multi-hop query. This limitation prevents researchers from analyzing at which step an agent fails and restricts more fine-grained evaluation of model capabilities. Moreover, most current benchmarks are manually constructed, which is both time-consuming and labor-intensive, while also limiting scalability and generalization. To address these challenges, we introduce AgenticRAGTracer, the first Agentic RAG benchmark that is primarily constructed automatically by large language models and designed to support step-by-step validation. Our benchmark spans multiple domains, contains 1,305 data points, and has no overlap with existing mainstream benchmarks. Extensive experiments demonstrate that even the best large language models perform poorly on our dataset. For instance, GPT-5 attains merely 22.6\% EM accuracy on the hardest portion of our dataset. Hop-aware diagnosis reveals that failures are primarily driven by distorted reasoning chains -- either collapsing prematurely or wandering into over-extension. This highlights a critical inability to allocate steps consistent with the task's logical structure, providing a diagnostic dimension missing in traditional evaluations. We believe our work will facilitate research in Agentic RAG and inspire further meaningful progress in this area. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/YqjMartin/AgenticRAGTracer.
