Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a framework for multi-round human-AI collaboration that incorporates user-defined rules to ensure counterfactual harm (AI doesn't undermine human strengths) and complementarity (AI adds value where humans err). They formalize these principles and develop an online, distribution-free algorithm with finite sample guarantees to enforce user-specified constraints on the collaboration dynamics. Empirical evaluations in medical diagnosis (LLM simulation) and pictorial reasoning (human crowdsourcing) demonstrate the algorithm's ability to maintain prescribed violation rates and predictably influence human accuracy by adjusting constraint stringency.
User-defined rules for "counterfactual harm" and "complementarity" let you steer human-AI collaboration toward better decisions without modeling human behavior.
As humans increasingly rely on multiround conversational AI for high stakes decisions, principled frameworks are needed to ensure such interactions reliably improve decision quality. We adopt a human centric view governed by two principles: counterfactual harm, ensuring the AI does not undermine human strengths, and complementarity, ensuring it adds value where the human is prone to err. We formalize these concepts via user defined rules, allowing users to specify exactly what harm and complementarity mean for their specific task. We then introduce an online, distribution free algorithm with finite sample guarantees that enforces the user-specified constraints over the collaboration dynamics. We evaluate our framework across two interactive settings: LLM simulated collaboration on a medical diagnostic task and a human crowdsourcing study on a pictorial reasoning task. We show that our online procedure maintains prescribed counterfactual harm and complementarity violation rates even under nonstationary interaction dynamics. Moreover, tightening or loosening these constraints produces predictable shifts in downstream human accuracy, confirming that the two principles serve as practical levers for steering multi-round collaboration toward better decision quality without the need to model or constrain human behavior.
