Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the role of the availability heuristic in multiple-choice question (MCQ) answering by quantifying the prevalence of MCQ options in large corpora and correlating it with answer correctness. They found that correct answers are significantly more available (i.e., prevalent in Wikipedia) than incorrect options across three large question sets. Selecting the most available option yields scores significantly above the random-guess baseline, suggesting that availability influences MCQ answering behavior.
Forget complex reasoning – simply picking the most frequent concept in Wikipedia can boost your multiple-choice test scores by up to 33%.
When students are unsure of the correct answer to a multiple-choice question (MCQ), guessing is common practice. The availability heuristic, proposed by A. Tversky and D. Kahneman in 1973, suggests that the ease with which relevant instances come to mind, typically operationalised by the mere frequency of exposure, can offer a mental shortcut for problems in which the test-taker does not know the exact answer. Is simply choosing the option that comes most readily to mind a good strategy for answering MCQs? We propose a computational method of assessing the cognitive availability of MCQ options operationalised by concepts' prevalence in large corpora. The key finding, across three large question sets, is that correct answers, independently of the question stem, are significantly more available than incorrect MCQ options. Specifically, using Wikipedia as the retrieval corpus, we find that always selecting the most available option leads to scores 13.5% to 32.9% above the random-guess baseline. We further find that LLM-generated MCQ options show similar patterns of availability compared to expert-created options, despite the LLMs' frequentist nature and their training on large collections of textual data. Our findings suggest that availability should be considered in current and future work when computationally modelling student behaviour.
