Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The study investigates how users perceive empathy in relationship advice generated by humans versus large language models (LLMs), examining the influence of authorship labels on perceived quality and different types of empathy (cognitive, emotional, motivational). Through two preregistered experiments, participants rated advice texts, revealing that LLM-generated advice was consistently perceived as higher in overall quality, cognitive empathy, and motivational empathy compared to human-written advice. The findings challenge the assumption of a negativity bias toward AI-labelled content and suggest that linguistic features are more influential than authorship beliefs in shaping perceptions of empathic communication.
LLMs aren't just cold machines: people actually rate their relationship advice as *more* empathetic than advice from other humans.
Artificial intelligence systems increasingly generate text intended to provide social and emotional support. Understanding how users perceive empathic qualities in such content is therefore critical. We examined differences in perceived empathy signals between human-written and large language model (LLM)-generated relationship advice, and the influence of authorship labels. Across two preregistered experiments (Study 1: n = 641; Study 2: n = 500), participants rated advice texts on overall quality and perceived cognitive, emotional, and motivational empathy. Multilevel models accounted for the nested rating structure. LLM-generated advice was consistently perceived as higher in overall quality, cognitive empathy, and motivational empathy. Evidence for a widely reported negativity bias toward AI-labelled content was limited. Emotional empathy showed no consistent source advantage. Individual differences in AI attitudes modestly influenced judgments but did not alter the overall pattern. These findings suggest that perceptions of empathic communication are primarily driven by linguistic features rather than authorship beliefs, with implications for the design of AI-mediated support systems.
