Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the impact of linguistically expressed CA personalities on user perceptions and donation decisions in a charitable giving scenario. The authors manipulated attitude (optimistic/pessimistic), authority (authoritative/submissive), and reasoning (emotional/rational) across eight different CAs. While personality configurations did not directly affect donation amounts, pessimistic CAs led to lower user emotional states, reduced trust and competence perceptions, yet paradoxically, higher donations, highlighting the subtle manipulative potential of CAs.
Pessimistic conversational agents can paradoxically increase charitable donations despite being perceived as less trustworthy, revealing the subtle power of AI personality on user behavior.
Large Language Model-powered conversational agents (CAs) are increasingly capable of projecting sophisticated personalities through language, but how these projections affect users is unclear. We thus examine how CA personalities expressed linguistically affect user decisions and perceptions in the context of charitable giving. In a crowdsourced study, 360 participants interacted with one of eight CAs, each projecting a personality composed of three linguistic aspects: attitude (optimistic/pessimistic), authority (authoritative/submissive), and reasoning (emotional/rational). While the CA's composite personality did not affect participants' decisions, it did affect their perceptions and emotional responses. Particularly, participants interacting with pessimistic CAs felt lower emotional state and lower affinity towards the cause, perceived the CA as less trustworthy and less competent, and yet tended to donate more toward the charity. Perceptions of trust, competence, and situational empathy significantly predicted donation decisions. Our findings emphasize the risks CAs pose as instruments of manipulation, subtly influencing user perceptions and decisions.
